Legal Opinion
Brickley v. Offshore Shipyard, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided July 24, 1967No. Civ. A. 67-275PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEEBE, District Judge:
The plaintiff in this case, Ernest Brickley, has sued Offshore Shipyard, Inc., his former employer and owner pro hac vice of the unknown barge cited in the caption, as well as Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Company of New York, Offshore’s insurer, for damage» for personal injuries sustained aboard Offshore’s vessel. The complaint is styled a civil action; plaintiff alleges in Count 4 of the complaint that he “was employed as a seaman aboard the aforesaid vessel, was more or less permanently attached to same, and contributed to the overall mission of the vessel,” and bases…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Reed v. the YakaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- American Fidelity and Casualty Company, Inc. v. The London and Edinburgh Insurance Company, Limited, and the Dominion Insurance Company, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- Canal Insurance Company v. BrooksDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1962
3Cited by7 opinions
- Marcos Garcia v. The Queen, Ltd., and Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Voisin v. Ocean Protein, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
- Hanover Ins. Co. v. Highlands Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Benniefield v. Valley Barge LinesDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1979
- Standard Dry Kiln Company, a Corporation v. Bituminous Fire and Marine Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.