Legal Opinion

Mead v. Michigan Central Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1913No. Docket No. 17PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne; Van Zile, J. Case by John Mead and George Mead, copartners as Mead & Company, against the Michigan Central Railroad Company for damages to property resulting from a grade separation. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Plaintiffs brought suit in the circuit court for Wayne county against defendant in an action on the case in trespass for damages claimed to have been suffered through wrongfully digging and excavating in the street along the property owned by plaintiffs, thereby lowering the grade of said street from three to eight feet, against the protest of plaintiffs. To the declaration filed in the case defendant entered a plea of the general issue with notice that by an agreement with the city of Detroit for the separation of grades at Twentieth street and its railroad, near where plaintiff’s property…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Detroit v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. City of Detroit v. Grand Trunk Railway of CanadaMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Harper v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Brown v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thom v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Case v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. A. M. Campau Realty Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Grigg Hanna Lumber & Box Co. v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Bercel Garages, Inc. v. MacOmb County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API