Partida v. United States Department of Justice
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
This bankruptcy appeal presents a question of first impression in this circuit concerning whether the Bankruptcy Code’s automatic stay provision, 11 U.S.C. § 362, operates to prevent the government’s collection of criminal restitution under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (“MVRA”). The MVRA provides the government with broad powers to enforce a civil judgment “[njotwithstanding any other federal law.” 18 U.S.C. § 3613(a). We agree with the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) that the MVRA allows the government to collect restitution despite the automatic…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge GroupSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Jose Alfredo Pallares-GalanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Eskanos & Adler, P.C. v. Somkiat G. LeetienCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Raymond P. NovakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Estate of RomaniSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Ellen SwensonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Spero v. Community Chevrolet, Inc. (In re Grooms)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Jesus Lopez Silva v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Jesus Lopez Silva v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. William PoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018