Legal Opinion
Bridier v. Burns
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided December 2, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR MODIFICATION
On November 4, 1941, an order here was entered, upon a petition of H.E. Orr, successor by deed to the interests of D.J. Bridier and wife, Grace D. Bridier, owners of the equity of redemption of the mortgaged premises here involved, and the order directed the lower court to immediately effectuate the mandate previously issued in the case of Bridier v. Burns,145 Fla. 642, 200 So. 355. On November 12, 1941, since the entry of the aforesaid order, H.E. Orr, owner of the equity of redemption of the mortgaged premises, by counsel, here presented a motion for a modification…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The BANK OF THE UNITED STATES v. the Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Quinn Plumbing Co. Inc. v. New Miami Shores Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Johns v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Marks v. CowlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- Key West Wharf & Coal Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sundie v. HarenSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- 601 West 26 Corp. v. Equity Capital Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Trueman Fertilizer Company v. LesterSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
- Am. Bankers Life v. Williams, Salomon, KannerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Bridier v. BurnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.