Finn v. Ironclad Mfg. Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal from Special Term, Kings County. Action by Joseph Finn against the Ironclad Manufacturing Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for new trial, defendant appeals.
1DissentWoodward, J.
The plaintiff in this action was an employé of the defendant, and was injured on the 4th day of April, *8881901, by a piece of sheet iron or tin alleged to have been negligently left in the pathway provided by the defendant for egress from its factory. It seems that the defendant, engaged in the manufacture of buckets, pails, etc., from sheét iron or tin, for reasons of its own had changed the method by which its employés left the factory at the close of the day about one week before the happening of this accident, and that the way pointed out ran through a passageway in the rear of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marsh v. . ChickeringNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Hickey v. . TaaffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Dowd v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Rice v. . Eureka Paper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Simone v. . KirkNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Colonna Shipyard, Inc. v. BlandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928