Legal Opinion
Yahoo!, Inc. v. Net Games, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 2, 2004No. C-02-5809 VRWPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WALKER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Yahoo!, Inc, filed suit against defendant, Net Games, Inc, making a number of claims, including trademark infringement. Doc # 1. On November 25, 2003, the court granted plaintiffs motion for default judgment. Doc #28. The court also found that plaintiff is entitled to attorney fees under 15 USC § 1117(a). Id.
Plaintiff submitted a request for attorney fees in the amount of $31,121.56. Mosko Decl (Doc # 18). Plaintiff requested reimbursement for 52.8 hours at $266 per hour (“/hr”) for Jonathan Gelchinsky, 7.7 hours at $494/hr for David Kelly, 13.9 hours at…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Penpower Technology Ltd. v. S.P.C. TechnologyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Katz v. ChevaldinaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
- In Re HPL TECHNOLOGIES, INC SECURITIES LITIGATIONDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005
- Partners for Health & Home, L.P. v. Seung Wee YangDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.