Legal Opinion

Pappert v. Sargent

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1993No. S-4021PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*67OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

William and Sheryl Pappert appeal the trial court’s decision to rescind their 1981 transaction with Harold Sargent, in which the Papperts traded a mobile home for Mr. Sargent’s property on Ugak Bay. The trial court found that Mr. Sargent was incompetent when he traded the property and that the Papperts knew or should have known of his condition. The trial court therefore voided the transaction and denied the Pap-perts restitution. Although the record supports the trial court’s finding that Mr. Sargent was incompetent, it does not support the court’s finding that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Sprinkle v. Wellborn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Sea Lion Corp. v. Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Martens v. MetzgarAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Parker v. Northern Mixing Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kenai Chrysler Center, Inc. v. DenisonAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Hernandez v. BanksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. 718 ASSOCIATES v. BanksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Kenai Chrysler Center, Inc. v. DenisonAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Pappert v. SargentAlaska Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API