Legal Opinion
Beausoleil v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 8, 2001No. C.A. 98-11503PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WOLF, District Judge.
This memorandum is based upon the transcript of the decision rendered orally on May 30, 2001, in which the court allowed the motion of defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) for reconsideration of the court’s March 30, 2001 decision regarding preemption of the plaintiffs excessive speed claims and denied the defendant’s renewed motion for summary judgment. This memorandum adds citations, deletes some colloquy, clarifies some language, and amplifies the discussion of federal preemption.
The court is reconsidering the decision…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sandler v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- O'Bannon Ex Rel. O'Bannon v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1997
- Inferrera v. Town of SudburyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Romana v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Myers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Anderson v. Wisconsin Central Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
- Boyd v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Carter v. National Railroad PassengerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Boyd v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.