Legal Opinion

Gray v. City of Boston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 12, 1931PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

It is recited in the exceptions that this is an action of tort to recover compensation for damages growing out of an alleged taking of land by the defendant for a station on the East Boston tunnel, and that such *167damages arose from the careless way in which the defendant carried on the work of constructing the station and from the negligence of the servants and agents of the defendant in occupying and using premises of the plaintiff and in moving and handling his property, whereby injury resulted to personal property and the business of the plaintiff. The declaration alleged negligence of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moynihan v. ToddMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Donohue v. City of NewburyportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Peabody v. Boston & Providence RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  4. Cavanagh v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  5. Energy Electric Co. v. General Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Douglas v. WhittakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Poorvu v. WeisbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Mulvaney v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Brignati v. MedenwaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Waugh v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API