Legal Opinion

Williams v. Gold Hill Min. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California

Decided August 28, 1899No. 12,531PublishedCited by 6 opinions

This is a suit to foreclose a mortgage given by a mining corporation on its mining property. The answering defendants are judgment creditors of the mortgagor. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

MOKROW, Circuit Judge.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage upon certain mining property situated in Nevada county, in this state. The mortgage was executed by the Gold Hill Mining Company on July 1, 1890, and conveyed the property mortgaged to G. Livingston Morse, of the city of New York, as trustee, to secure the payment of 100 bonds of $500 each, making $50,000 in all, payable at five years from date, with interest, payable semiannually, at the rate of 10 per cent, per annum. The respondents George G. Gaylord, Charles E. Maddrell, and Dwight T. Kolfe are judgment creditors of the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  3. Elmendorf v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  4. Gardner v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  5. Railroad Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Royal Consol. Mining Co. v. Royal Consol. Mines (Cal.) Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Crane v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Long Construction Co. v. Empire Drive-In Theatres, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. In re Heffron Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1914
  5. Bennett v. Red Cloud Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API