Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fish v. Township of Lower Merion

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 19, 2014Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

President Judge PELLEGRINI.

Because Lower Merion Township’s (Township) business privilege tax (BPT) is a tax on the privilege of leasing real property in the Township, a different subject of tax, and not on the leases or lease transactions themselves, I would hold that the Township’s BPT does not violate Section 301.1(f)(1) of the Local Tax Enabling Act (LTEA).1 Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.

Appellants have a number of rental properties in the Township from which they derive rent. Section 301.1(a) of the LTEA authorizes local taxing authorities to levy, assess and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gilberti v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Tech One Associates v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Lynnebrook and Woodbrook Associates, Lp Ex Rel. Lynnebrook Manor, Inc. v. MillersvilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. SCHOOL DIST. CITY OF SCRANTON v. Dale and Dale Design and Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Township of Lower Merion v. Qed, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API