Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Puget Sound Machinery Depot

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1918No. 14226PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered December 23, 1916, in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to determine the validity of claims against a contractor’s bond, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This action was brought by the respondent Pearson to require certain defendants, who were made parties, to establish their claims against a surety bond guaranteeing the construction of a building for the port of Seattle. The appellant, Puget Sound Machinery Depot, was made a party defendant in that action, and alleged, in substance, that it had furnished a boiler to be used in the construction of the building; that there was due upon the boiler something over $700; that, on June 12, 1915, it filed its claim against the bond; and it sought to have its claim against the bond established in this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Denny-Renton Clay & Coal Co. v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Wheeler, Osgood Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. McGowan Bros. Hardware Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandWashington Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kirkpatrick v. DouglasMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  2. National Blower & Sheet Metal Co. v. American Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State Construction Inc v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API