Legal Opinion

United States v. David Scott, Carl Buchholz, and Gregory Sumpter

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 4, 2001No. 00-3130, 00-3149, 00-3150PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

A jury convicted the defendants, David Scott, Carl Buchholz and Gregory Sump-ter, of possession with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. Scott and Buchholz also were charged with, and convicted of, carrying a firearm during a drug trafficking offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). The defendants now appeal their convictions on numerous grounds. For the reasons set forth in the following opinion, we affirm the judgments of the district court.

I

BACKGROUND

A. Facts

In the summer of 1996, Chad Little and friends, Tommy Smith and David Scott,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. William M. Percival, Carolyn Allen Percival, Randy L. Middleton, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Reyes VargasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. James Badger, Roscoe Foreman, Marcia F. Ivy, and Mariano "Mario" LettieriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Vetta LinwoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Shaquille Griffin v. Richard BellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Louis JamesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Dwight A. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API