Legal Opinion · Dissent

CIT Group/Commercial Services, Inc. v. 160-09 Jamaica Avenue Ltd. Partnership

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 3, 2006Published

1DissentSaxe, J.

I conclude that under CPLR 317, respondent 160-09 Jamaica Avenue Limited Partnership was entitled to vacatur of its default in this turnover proceeding brought by a judgment creditor against respondent as the judgment debtor’s transferee. The motion seeking to vacate its default should have been granted and its proposed answer deemed served.

Facts

Petitioner CIT Group obtained assignment of the accounts re*304ceivable owed to a clothing vendor by Central Men’s Shop, a store whose place of business was located at 160-09 Jamaica Avenue, for purchases made from the vendor between May 2000 and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A. C. Dutton Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Wall Street Associates v. BrodskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Ultramar Energy Ltd. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Grosso v. MTO Associates Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Mega Personal Lines, Inc. v. HaltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API