Legal Opinion

Cureton v. Wright

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 13, 1884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Master in Chancery. Auditor. Practice in Superior Court. Sheriff. Actions. Equity. 'Contracts. Before Judge Fain. Dade Superior Court; Marcli Term, 1883. Reported in the decision.'

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Justice.

All tbe property of the Rising-Fawn Iron Company was subject to two mortgages, designated as first and second mortgages, and each for tbe sum'of one-hundred and seventy-five thousand dollars. ' All tbe bonds, to secure .which the first mortgage was given, had been negotiated, but what portion of those the second mortgage had been made to secure had been disposed of, is somewhat uncertain, though, it is quite evident that a part of them had been put into circulation, and so this latter mortgage -as to them became operative. After this time, the company incurred large indebtedness…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hendrick v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
  2. Orr v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Knight v. ForbesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Smith v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Barlow v. Toole, McGarrah & TondeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API