Legal Opinion

Ballinger v. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 16, 1951PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

54 So.2d 433 (1951)

BALLINGER et ux.

v.

SMITH.

Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc.

October 16, 1951.

J. Kenneth Ballinger, Tallahassee, for appellants.

Will J. Oven, Tallahassee, for appellee.

ROBERTS, Justice.

In a suit in the court below to determine the rights of the parties under a contract for the purchase and sale of a certain lot in Betton Hill Subdivision of Tallahassee, Florida, the court interpreted the following building restriction, to wit: "No residential lot shall be resubdivided into building lots other than those shown on the recorded plat heretofore referred to, nor shall any building…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trustees of Columbia College v. . ThacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Moore v. StevensSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  3. City of Miami Beach v. State Ex Rel. LearSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  4. Holmes v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  5. Mayes v. HaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hagan v. Sabal Palms, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  2. Barrett v. LeiherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. Jacksonville Expressway Authority v. BennettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  4. Imperial Golf Club, Inc. v. MonacoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  5. Belle Terre Ass'n v. BroschDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API