Legal Opinion

Payne v. Priddy

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 18, 1963No. 16457PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENFRO, Justice.

Plaintiffs Jewel Payne and husband brought suit in trespass to try title to Lot 10, Block 14, Fairview Addition to the City of Wichita Falls. O. H. Priddy and wife were named defendants.

Plaintiffs were record owners of Lot 10 and defendants were record owners of Lot 11.

Actually the lawsuit involved a tapering strip, two feet at its widest point, on the side of Lot 10 adjacent to Lot 11.

Defendants pleaded not guilty, and claimed said strip by reason of the 10 year statute of limitation.

Judgment was entered for defendants.

In his findings of fact the court found that Jack L. Cox…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pearson v. DohertyTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Stewart v. Luhning Et Ux.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. O'Meara v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Gleckler v. DentonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Pasha v. SchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Calfee v. DukeTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Julien v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Butler v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Bounds v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API