Legal Opinion

Smiley v. Newkirk

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 6, 1931No. 21426Published

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Tulsa county in an action for writ of mandamus sought by the defendant in error to compel plaintiff in error to pay over moneys alleged to be due.

Judgment was entered directing the issuance of a peremptory writ, and the plaintiff in error appeals.

The plaintiff in error has filed his brief, and the authorities cited reasonably support the contention of plaintiff in error. The defendant in error has filed in this cause a confession of error, and under this condition of the record in this cause the judgment of the trial court will be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adams v. PowerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Holmes v. Board of Com'rs of Osage CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Warrior v. SaverySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Holmes v. Board of Com'rs of Osage CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API