Legal Opinion · Dissent

Higginbottom v. Williford

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 22, 1950No. 4-9194Published

1Dissent

Holt, j.,

dissenting.

This action concerns the custody of a little girl approximately three years of age. The divorce is not now an issue. At the time the divorce decree was rendered, this child was less than two years of age.

We have frequently announced the rule, involving child care and custody, that the primary consideration must be, and is, the welfare of the child. In the present case, there is no evidence or contention that the young mother is morally unfit to have the care and custocly of this little girl of such tender years, and as I construe our rule, in all such cases, it is that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aucoin v. AucoinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  2. Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  3. Wimberly v. WimberlySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API