Dr. Michael Molleston v. River Oaks Hospital, Inc.

¶ 26. I respectfully dissent.

¶27. I begin with my concern as' to whether Dr. Molleston preserved his objection to a due-process violation; Dr. Molleston was aware that Dr. Bush was present at the hearing. Yet Dr. Molleston made no objection. Instead, the objection was raised only after he received an adverse ruling,

¶ 28. According to the transcript of the May 2 hearing, the chair identified the committee members' and included Dr. Bush; Dr.--Molleston "was aware that Dr. Bush had been on the Credentials Committee and made no objection.

¶29. Due process certainly provides Dr. Molleston the right…