State v. Golston
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
| ¶ These consolidated criminal cases are before us on direct appeal pursuant to La. Const, art. V, § 5(D). 1 We are called upon to determine whether the district court erred in declaring La. R.S. 15:560 et seq. unconstitutional. For the following reasons, we reverse the ruling of the district court.
1 .FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Defendants, Bryan Golston, Paul Baker, Calvin Watson, Lloyd Dell, and Reginald Jackson, are soon-to-be-released convicted sex offenders who have undergone the Sex Offender Assessment Panel (“SOAP”) process pursuant to La. R.S. 15:560 et seq.
The SOAP…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. BazileSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
- Eddy Oliver, Oscarlene Nixon, and Mildred Goodwin v. Orleans Parish School BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
- State v. TrosclairSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
- Commonwealth v. HermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.