Legal Opinion

Van Deren v. Heineke & Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 8, 1927No. Nos. 25,425 and 27,007PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action for damages for breach of a contract under which plaintiff held the agency for the sale of threshing-machine feeders manufactured by defendant.

Defendant is a foreign corporation not authorized to transact its corporate business in Kansas, and plaintiff resorted to two methods of service to bring defendant into court in Sedgwick county. One of these was to cause summons to defendant to be served on one J. Wirth Sargent, a member of a firm of lawyers in Wichita employed to look after defendant’s legal affairs. Mr. Sargent…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cold Blast Transp. Co. v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  2. Velie Motor Car Co. v. Kopmeier Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
  3. Crane v. C. Crane & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
  4. Oakland Motor Car Co. v. Indiana Automobile Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
  5. Joliet Bottling Co. v. Joliet Citizens' Brewing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nelson v. SchippelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Acme Cigarette Services, Inc. v. GallegosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Swart v. HustonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  4. Quinton v. KendallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Sage v. Oil Country Specialties Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API