Stradley v. . King
Supreme Court of North Carolina
MotioN by defendants to set aside a judgment confirming a sale of land for assets, heard at June Special Term, 1380, of HeNDKRSON Superior Court, before Schenck, J. The plaintiff appealed from the judgment.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.
The defendants, after due notice, apply to the probate court to vacate and set aside the judgment rendered therein on September 4th, 1871, whereby the sale of the tract of land before authorized for the payment of the debts of the intestate, then reported by the plaintiff, was coil-firmed and title directed to be made to the purchaser; 'and they assign as the grounds of the application inadequacy of price, false information conveyed in the report, fraud and collusion between the purchaser, (the attorney and adviser of the plaintiff) and the plaintiff, whereby the land was bought in for and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Henry J. Heryey & Co. v. EdmundsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
- Vick v. . PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- Wolfe v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
- Blue v. . BlueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- Hart v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. . FortSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Edwards v. . PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884