Stedham v. Farmers State Bank
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
In the bill of exceptions the only judgment excepted to was the overruling of a motion for a continuance of the ease. There was no exception to the verdict and the judgment based thereon. It is obvious that a judgment overruling a motion to continue a cause is not a final judgment within the meaning of section 6138 of the Civil Code of 1910; and the bill of exceptions, containing no exceptions to any judgment or decision final in its nature, can not be entertained. See, in this connection, Moore v. Hill, 87 Ga. 91 (13 S. E. 259); Barney v. Bowles, 112 Ga. 421 (37 S. E. 364) ; MeCranie v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harvey v. BowlesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Guardian v. ShippCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Cheney v. Corbitt Motor-Truck Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Moore, Son & Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rivers v. KeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940