Legal Opinion

Allied Healthcare Products, Inc. v. Stuyvesant Falls Hydro Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 1, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Proceeding initiated in this Court pursuant to EDPL 207 to review a determination of respondent which found a public benefit to be served by the proposed acquisition of certain property known as the Stuyvesant Falls Hydroelectric Project.

Respondent and the Town of Stuyvesant were issued a license by the Federal Energy Regulation Commission for the operation of the Stuyvesant Falls Hydroelectric Project, located in the Town of Stuyvesant, Columbia County. In a companion case (Matter of Erie Blvd. Hydropower, L.P. v Stuyvesant Falls Hydro Corp., 30 AD3d 641 [2006] [decided herewith]), we fully…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. East Thirteenth Street Community Ass'n v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Vaccaro v. JorlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L.P. v. Stuyvesant Falls Hydro Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Hart v. Town of Guilderland Indus. Dev. AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API