Legal Opinion

Ross v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 4, 2001No. CR 01-177; CR 01-268; 01-269; CR 00-1445; CR 01-336; CR 01-348; CR 01-342PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The facts of this matter, which concern the failure of Madeline McClure, an official court reporter, to timely file seven different transcripts with this court’s clerk, are set out in our per curiam opinion issued on May 17, 2001. Ross v. State, 344 Ark. 623, 42 S.W.3d 483 (2001). We stated in that opinion that Ms. McClure had failed to comply with the writs of certiorari granted and issued in the above-referenced matters. We ordered Ms. McClure to appear before this court on May 24, 2001, to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of court for her failure to comply in a timely…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Poyner v. Arkansas Contractors Licensing BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re BurkeSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2008
  2. In Re HoppockMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  3. James Tree & Crane Serv. v. Fought ‎(2)‎Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API