Anderson v. Fortune Brands, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Herbert Kramer, J.
Should a plaintiff in a New York products liability action be permitted to allege a cause of action for the willful failure to warn?1
Plaintiff Clyde Anderson smoked cigarettes manufactured by R.J. Reynolds, Lorillard and Philip Morris. The liability of the remaining defendant manufacturers2 and two industry-based research organizations is premised in part upon the theory that these defendants conspired to willfully fail to warn of the dangers of cigarette smoking.3
Defendants question, on policy grounds, the wisdom and fairness of submitting the willful…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Rastelli v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Home Insurance v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Seminara v. Highland Lake Bible Conference, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grill v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Davis v. Fortune Brands, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2000