Lloyd v. Norman
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Per curiam
The original motion for a new trial, and the first three grounds of the amended motion are general, and raise only the question of whether there is any evidence, under the laws and facts, to support the verdict of the jury. There was no attack on the validity of the contract on which the action is based, and its execution on the part of the defendant was admitted. By the terms of the contract, when it was negotiated the agent had rendered a valuable service for which either the seller or the buyer was liable to her for a commission, the seller being primarily liable, and the buyer becoming…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pearson v. HorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- McLeod v. HendrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Turman v. SmarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Bank of Commerce v. KnowlesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Day, Gaskin & Co. v. JeffordsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ellis v. Von KampCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Haislip v. GarberCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Hunter v. McLellandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977