Legal Opinion · Dissent

Olson v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1939No. 30682Published

1DissentSimmons, C. J.

I agree with the finding of fact set out in the opinion of the majority, in that the evidence established, and the jury found, that plaintiff was a passenger of the defendant; that the street car had started in its normal course; that there was a sudden and violent stop that caused the plaintiff to fall, and that injury to the plaintiff resulted.

I do not agree with the conclusions of law set out in the majority opinion. The case is reversed because of the giving of instruction No. 3 requested by the plaintiff. An analysis of that instruction shows that the court told the jury that, where a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Spellman v. Lincoln Rapid Transit Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Lincoln Street Railway Co. v. McClellanNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Mercer v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Lincoln Traction Co. v. WebbNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Omaha Street Railway Co. v. BoesenNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API