Olson v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1DissentSimmons, C. J.
I agree with the finding of fact set out in the opinion of the majority, in that the evidence established, and the jury found, that plaintiff was a passenger of the defendant; that the street car had started in its normal course; that there was a sudden and violent stop that caused the plaintiff to fall, and that injury to the plaintiff resulted.
I do not agree with the conclusions of law set out in the majority opinion. The case is reversed because of the giving of instruction No. 3 requested by the plaintiff. An analysis of that instruction shows that the court told the jury that, where a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Spellman v. Lincoln Rapid Transit Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Lincoln Street Railway Co. v. McClellanNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Mercer v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Lincoln Traction Co. v. WebbNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Omaha Street Railway Co. v. BoesenNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.