Legal Opinion

Dean v. Tabsum, Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 2, 2000No. S00A1331PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, Justice.

The issue raised in this granted interlocutory appeal is whether OCGA § 50-21-28, which provides that venue under the Georgia Tort Claims Act (GTCA)1 is in the county where the loss occurred, is unconstitutional because it conflicts with the joint tortfeasor venue provision of the Georgia Constitution.2 We conclude that the rationale of our decisions in Campbell v. Dept. of Corrections3 and Glover v. Donaldson4 requires that we hold that the venue limitation set forth in OCGA § 50-21-28 is constitutional because it is a valid exercise of the General Assembly’s constitutional…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Glover v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. Campbell v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  3. C. W. Matthews Contracting Co. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of the University System v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  2. Gonzalez v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. McG Health, Inc. v. Marcia BradleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API