Day v. Hawkeye Ins.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Mahaslca Oiveioit Coxvrt. AotioN upon a policy of fire insurance. There was a trial to a jury, and verdict and judgment were rendered for the defendant. The plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Adams, Ch. J.
1. appeal: Sted or not: abstract. I. The defendant insists that it does not appear that any appeal was taken, in that it is not stated that any notice of appeal was filed. The abstract contains the statement that “ the plaintiffs appealed from the judgment.” In the absence of any showing to the contrary, we assume that this statement is true; that is, that every thing was done which is necessary in order to take an appeal.
2. pike insur-vafbetween_ eatkm°an(fpli policy: foreclosure effect. II. The defendant claimed that the jiolicy was rendered void by the commencement of the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Kaplan v. Manhattan Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Pioneer Savings & Loan Co. v. Providence Washington InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Cooledge v. Continental Ins.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1894
- Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. National Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Dolan v. Midland Blast Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.