Legal Opinion
In Re Vollen
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 19, 2010No. 09-12460PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBERT E. NUGENT, Chief Judge.
The chapter 13 Trustee objects to the confirmation of debtor Barbara Jean Vol-len’s chapter 13 plan. Specifically, the Trustee objects to the debtor’s claimed marital adjustment deductions for her non-filing spouse on Line 13 and Line 19 of Official Form 22C, the Chapter 13 Statement of Current Monthly Income and Calculation of Commitment Period and Disposable Income (“Form 22C” or “B22C”). 1 First, the trustee objects to Ms. Vollen’s use of a marital adjustment deduction on Line 13 of Form 22C. This deduction results in Ms. Vollen being a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kibbe v. SumskiBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2007
- Hamilton v. Lanning (In Re Lanning)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Cady v. CadySupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- In Re QuartermanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2006
- Hamilton v. LanningSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re ToxvardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2013
- In Re HammockUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2010
- In re MontaltoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- In re PersaudUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- In Re StanleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.