McKendrick v. State Tax Commission
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Chief Justice.
Review of decision of the Tax Commission assessing deficiency of $345.28 as the 2% state sales tax on plaintiff’s sales of artificial limbs, which the Commission held to be “retail sale of tangible personal property.” 1
Plaintiff’s position is that what he sells is in essence a professional service in making the artificial limb and in fitting it to and training the user, comparable to furnishing such other personal aids as dental plates and artificial eyes; and that the materials used represent such a small portion of the total charge that they are “merely incidental”…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Western Leather & Finding Co. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Pacific Intermountain Express Co. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1957
- Young Electric Sign Co. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1955
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cache County v. Property Tax Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Undercofler v. Whiteway Neon Ad, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- BJ-Titan Services v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Tummurru Trades, Inc. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- Eaton Kenway, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.