Williams v. State

BILLINGS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant Nathaniel Williams lodged this appeal from the denial of his pro se motion to vacate concurrent sentences for stealing an automobile and first degree robbery which were entered in 1972 following his pleas of guilty. Appellant contends that the trial court should have appointed an attorney to represent him in this proceeding, should have conducted an evidentiary hearing, and should have made findings of fact and conclusions of law in ruling his motion. We affirm.

Appellant first sought Rule 27.26, V.A. M.R., relief from the sentences in 1976. He claimed he…