Legal Opinion
Landix v. Blunt
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 20, 2013No. 2012-CA-1231PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL L. DYSART, Judge.
|,This appeal is taken from a judgment in favor of appellees (defendants/plaintiffs-in-reconvention), Donna Blunt and Patricia Nicholson (sometimes collectively referred to as “appellees”), dismissing the claims of Kenneth Landix, appellant (plaintiff/defendant-in-reconvention). For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This case concerns the reconstruction and renovation of a home located at 3126 N. Johnson St., in New Orleans, Louisiana (the “Property”), and owned by Patricia Nicholson and her daughter, Donna Blunt.1 The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wooley v. LucksingerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
- Watters v. Department of Social ServicesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Stanton v. Tulane University of LouisianaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Sam Staub Enterprises, Inc. v. ChapitalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Tallulah Const. v. Ne La Delta DevelopmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Duvio v. Specialty Pools Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Community Development Capital v. Housing Corporation of America, Gregory Swafford, and Vanessa Marie Caliste Swafford and Holding Renaissance Property, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2021
- Dixon v. Capital One BankDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
- Hickey v. AngeloLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- Hickey v. AngeloLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.