Coulston v. H. Franke Steel Range Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
In Equity. Suit by Earl V. Coulston and another against the H. Franke Steel Range Company, Incorporated. On motion to require defendant to make its answer more definite and certain.
1Opinion of the Court
CEARKE, District Judge.
This cause came on for hearing upon the motion of the plaintiff that the defendant be required to make its answer more definite and certain, by setting forth in what respects each of the patents pleaded by reference in paragraph 8 of the answer discloses any of the elements or combinations of elements described in plaintiff’s letters patent, and in what respect they negative the novelty and invention of the device shown and described in complainant’s letters patent set forth in the bill of complaint.
[ 1 ] This court is in entire sympathy with this motion, believing, as…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Wilson v. Union Tool Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1921
- Teller v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
- Stephenson v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919