Legal Opinion

Continental Bank v. Moscatiello

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1982PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur W. Lonschein, J.

This is a motion to punish the defendant for contempt. It raises certain questions about the proper construction of section 761 of the Judiciary Law which have not previously been encountered.

The motion was brought on by a simple notice of motion sent, by mail, only to the defendant’s attorney. The Judiciary Law now allows commencement of a contempt motion by a notice (Judiciary Law, § 756, as added by L 1977, ch 437, § 2). Pursuant to section 761 of the Judiciary Law, however, the application to punish for contempt “shall be served upon the accused,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Long Island Trust Co. v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Higher Education Assistance Corp. v. CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. People ex rel. Golden v. GoldenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Columbia Federal Savings Bank v. BuyokasNew York Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API