Isaacson v. Parker
South Dakota Supreme Court
On rehearing. (i) To point one of the opinion, Appellant cited: Wickre et al. v. In. Twp. et al, -31 S. D. 23. ’Réspondent cited: St. Paul Gas Company v. Sandstone, 73 Minn. 225, 75 N. W. 1050; 'School District 50 v. State, 29 Kan. '57; 'Coler v. Rhoda School Twp., 6 S. D. 640, 63 N. W. 158. The Attorney General, Amicus Curaie, cited: Continental Trust Company v. Toledo, etc., 82 Red. 842. (2) To point three, Respondents cited: Laws 1915, ch. 289, sec. 1. (3) To point three,…
Read the full summary
On rehearing. (i) To point one of the opinion, Appellant cited: Wickre et al. v. In. Twp. et al, -31 S. D. 23. ’Réspondent cited: St. Paul Gas Company v. Sandstone, 73 Minn. 225, 75 N. W. 1050; 'School District 50 v. State, 29 Kan. '57; 'Coler v. Rhoda School Twp., 6 S. D. 640, 63 N. W. 158. The Attorney General, Amicus Curaie, cited: Continental Trust Company v. Toledo, etc., 82 Red. 842. (2) To point three, Respondents cited: Laws 1915, ch. 289, sec. 1. (3) To point three, Appellant cited: People et al, v. Stewart (111.) 118 N. E. 55; State ex rel Baleh v. Fry, et al, (Mo.) 85 S. W. 328.
1Opinion of the CourtGates, J.
[1] The respondents petitioned for a rehearing. The former opinion of this court is found in 176 -N. W. 653-The Attorney General, representing the educational department of the state, filed a petition as amicus curiae. In view of the fact that the decision of this court was adverse to the construction placed 'by the educational department upon the consolidated school law, we granted a rehearing. Able counsel argued the questions before the court. Elaborate ibriefs wer.e filed by the parties and by the Attorney General. The principal ground urged' by respondents, aside fromi the claims that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tulare Irrigation District v. ShepardSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Schweigert v. AbbottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Faunce v. SearlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Coler v. Rhoda School TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hodges v. SnyderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
- Alatalo v. ShaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- Nelson v. LembckeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. WhitfieldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937