Legal Opinion

Chamberlain v. Childs' Unique Dairy Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtGreenbaum, J.

When the previous motion for an injunction in this case was before me, I referred to Agate v. Lowenbein, 57 N. Y. 604, 612, as authority for the proposition that where a tenant has committed waste and thereby “ has gone beyond the powers conceded by the lease, he has either been restrained by injunction or compelled at once to make satisfaction or to restore the premises to the condition in which he found them.” After the denial of the former motion, the present motion was made for a mandatory injunction to compel the defendant to seal up the portions of the wall which he had cut without any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Agate v. . LowenbeinNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Winship v. PittsNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  3. Watson v. HunterNew York Court of Chancery · 1821

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McElligott v. Browning, King & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API