Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Carl Peter Niemann v. Greer

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided January 17, 1975No. Civ. A. 74-670PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARLOW, District Judge.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus brought by the petitioner, Carl Peter Niemann, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner, a former United States Army Reservist, claims to have been improperly ordered to active duty due to his failure to satisfactorily participate in scheduled Army Reserve drills. Specifically, the petitioner alleges that he received no notice of his involuntary activation or of his right to appeal that activation. Having carefully reviewed the pleadings, the documentary evidence presented, and having heard the petitioner’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. John C. O'Mara v. Captain William Zebrowski, U.S.A.R., Commanding Officer and the Honorable Stanley Resor, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  2. Byrne v. ResorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  3. Mickey v. BarclayDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  2. Russo v. LubaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Sullivan v. MannDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API