Doerge v. Heimenz
Missouri Court of Appeals
Error to St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Wag. Stat. 918, sec. 10; p. 919, sec. 20; p. 1049, secs. 2,3; p. 1050, •sec'. 6 ; Ang. on Lim.
Read the full summary
Error to St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Wag. Stat. 918, sec. 10; p. 919, sec. 20; p. 1049, secs. 2,3; p. 1050, •sec'. 6 ; Ang. on Lim. (5th ed.) 47, sec. 56 ; Ayer’s Admr. ■v. Donnell, Exr., 57 Mo. 396 ; Labeaume v. Hempstead, 1 Mo. 773; Rhodes v. Smethurst, 4 M. & W. 42 ; McKin-zie, Admr. v. Hill, Admr., 51 Mo. 303; Graham v. King, •50 Mo. 22 ; Seibert v. Allen, 53 Mo. 44. cited: Monte'"lins v. Sarpe, 11 Mo. 242; Hawkins & Co. v. Ridenhan, 13 •Mo. 125; Bryan u.-Mundy’s Admr., 17 Mo. 556 ; Graham ■v. King, 50 Mo. 22; Wag. Stat. 919, 920, sec. 20. ■ •
1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.
It appears from the record in this case that plaintiff commenced suit in the Circuit Court of St. Louis county, on February 1, 1869, against J. F. Horst and others, on a •cause of action which accrued on January 1, 1867, which came under the clause of the statute barriug a recovery after five years. On March 1, 1870, Horst died, and on March 29, 1870, his administrator was appointed.
The administrator failed to publish the notice of grant of letters required by law. On April 17, 1871, the death of Horst was suggested in the proceedings in the Circuit Court, and on February 27, 1872, the cause…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ayers v. DonnellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
3Cited by2 opinions
- Little v. ReidMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
- Doerge v. HeimenzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1880