Legal Opinion

Chandon Champagne Corp. v. San Marino Wine Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 17, 1964No. 254, Docket 28419PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge.

Dom Pierre Pérignon, cellar-master of the Abbey of Hautvillers in Champagne, is popularly credited with discovering, more than two centuries ago, the process for making the wine that has brought fame to the region and delight to the world. We are here called upon to determine whether a French vintner, who has honored him by designating one of France’s finest champagnes as “Dom Pérignon,” may bar use of the Pérignon name by a New York producer. We affirm the judgment for the defendant, although we think the case somewhat closer than did the district judge, 222 F. Supp.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  2. Aunt Jemima Mills Co. v. Rigney & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  3. S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  4. Avon Shoe Co., Inc., and Haymaker Shoe Corp. v. David Crystal, Inc., Haymaker Sports, Inc., B. Altman & Co., Best & Co., Inc., and John WanamakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  5. Triumph Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Triumph International Corporation and Triumph of Europe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. McGregor-Doniger Inc. v. Drizzle Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. Thompson Medical Company, Inc. v. Pfizer Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  3. Centaur Communications, Limited v. A/s/m Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  4. La Societe Anonyme Des Parfums Le Galion v. Jean Patou, Inc. And Michael Stramiello, Jr., Collector of Customs of the Portof New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. American Footwear Corporation v. General Footwear Company Limited, and Universal City Studios, Inc., Intervening-Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API