Legal Opinion
Bruner v. United States
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided August 16, 2004No. 4:02-cv-00504PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOLMES, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court for a determination of whether a statute duly enacted by the United States Congress is enforceable under the Constitution of the United States. That statute, Section 3 of the Act of Congress dated May 10, 1928, 45 Stat. 495, provides in applicable part as follows:
That all minerals, including oil and gas, produced on or after April 26, 1931, from restricted allotted lands of members of the Five Civilized Tribes in Okla homa, or from inherited restricted lands of full-blood Indian heirs or devisees of such lands, shall be subject to…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Regan v. Taxation With Representation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bruner v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005