Van Cleve v. St. Louis, Memphis & Southeastern Railway Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Pemiscot Circuit Court. — No». Henry O. Riley, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtNortoni, J.
— This is a suit for damages alleged to have accrued to the plaintiff from personal injuries received hy her while a passenger alighting from defendant’s train. Plaintiff recovered and defendant prosecutes the appeal.
The evidence tends to prove the plaintiff was a pae-' senger on the defendant’s mixed train. She hoarded the train at Yarbro, Arkansas, destined to Caruthersville, Missouri, and paid the usual fare to the conductor. She was injured while in the act of alighting from the defendant’s passenger coach at the depot at Caruthersville, because of a sudden jerk of the train which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hombs v. CorbinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
- Canaday v. United Railways Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1908
- Feurt v. AmbroseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
- Shoninger v. DayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
- Van Cleve v. St. Louis, Memphis & Southeastern RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cooke v. Springfield Traction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
- Opinion No. (1984), Missouri Attorney General Reports1984