Legal Opinion

Hugo National Bank v. Ashworth

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 10, 1928No. 12,131PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

The hank sued Ashworth, his wife, and Childress. A general demurrer to plaintiff’s amended complaint was sustained. Judgment for costs was ordered in favor of defendants. The bank assigns error and asks for a supersedeas.

The essential allegations of the amended complaint, as far as covered by the briefs, show the following: Ashworth owes the bank, which claim has been reduced to judgment and filed in the office of the county clerk and recorder. Execution was issued and returned nulla bona. Ashworth undertook to transfer certain real estate to his wife, without consideration, for the purpose…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shuck v. QuackenbushSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  2. Italian-American Bank v. LeporeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  3. Stephens v. ParvinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ashworth v. Hugo National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API