Legal Opinion

Van Devanter v. Nixon

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1892No. 480PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the Fountain Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.

This was a motion by the appellee against the appellant, under section 675, R. S. 1881, for leave of court to issue execution on a judgment after the lapse of ten years from the entry thereof.

It was shown by the motion/ omitting the caption, etc., that the appellee, and his co-executor, Samuel Finney, of the last will of Peter S. Veeder, deceased, on the 28th day of December, 1876, recovered judgment against the appellants *305for $257.53 and costs, taxed at $35.25, and accruing costs; that certain payments, as shown therein, had been made on said judgment •, that no execution had issued thereon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Evansville Gas-Light Co. v. State ex rel. ReitzIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Cox v. DillIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Plough v. ReevesIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Blizzard v. BlizzardIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dryburg v. Mercur Gold Mining & Milling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Coffin v. PfauIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API