Legal Opinion

Lahav Flooring & Fixtures, Inc. v. Weinstein

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 17, 1991No. 91-918PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant seeks reversal of an order granting supplementary proceedings. We have jurisdiction under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(4) to review this non-final order entered after final judgment. See Mogul v. Fodiman, 406 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). We reverse upon the following brief analysis.

Appellants Lahav Flooring & Fixtures, Inc., and Joseph Lahav were sued by appel-lees, Alan and Patti Weinstein, who alleged that both the corporate defendant and Mr. Lahav were liable to appellees as a result of defective work in the installation of a tile floor. After trial, judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jacksonville Bulls Football, Ltd. v. BlattDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Mogul v. FodimanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Continental Cigar Corp. v. Edelman & Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin Young Private Investigative Agency, Inc. v. Department of Banking & Finance, Division of FinanceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API