Legal Opinion

C.M. v. M.C.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 2017No. B270525PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUI, J.

Defendant and appellant M.C. (M.C.) appeals from a judgment declaring plaintiff and respondent C.M. (Father) to be the sole legal parent of *1192triplet children (the Children) and finding that M.C. has no parental rights. M.C. was the gestational carrier for the Children, who were conceived in vitro using Father’s sperm and ova from an anonymous donor. Father and M.C. entered into the surrogacy arrangement pursuant to a written “In Vitro Fertilization Surrogacy Agreement” in 2015 (the Agreement). Each party was represented by separate counsel in negotiating the Agreement.

Despite the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Smith v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & ReformSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Re Celine R.California Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In re GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. City of Santa Barbara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Melissa Cook v. Cynthia HardingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Cal. Advocates for Nursing Home Reform v. Smith, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Sayler v. Yan SunMontana Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Sayler v. Yan SunMontana Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Cal. Advocates for Nursing Home Reform v. Smith, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API