Legal Opinion

Allgood v. Wetsel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 21, 1954No. 35839PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

Plaintiff, Earl Wetsel, brought this action against Carl Allgood and others to recover possession of Lots 1 and 2, Block 34, City of Mangum, Oklahoma, and to quiet title thereto.

The property in question was sold at the 1934 tax resale to one Hardin. Plaintiff asserts title to said property as the remote grantee of said 1934 tax resale purchaser. Plaintiff not only introduced the 1934 tax resale deed in evidence, but also introduced the 1934 resale notice and the notice of the original 1931 tax sale upon which the 1934 resale was based.

The 1934 resale' notice recites…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lind v. McKinleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. House v. MainkaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Terwilleger v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Westerheide v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Hodges v. PaschalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great Nat. Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Kizzire v. SarkeysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Settles v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API