Legal Opinion

Rock Island & Peoria Railway Co. v. Leisy Brewing Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1898PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Peoria county; the Hon. T. M. Shaw, Judge, presiding. This is a condemnation proceeding, begun by the appellant company for the purpose of condemning seven lots in the city of Peoria, to-wit, lots 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 and 37 in Mills’ second addition to that city. Lots 29, 30 and 31 are the property of the appellee, the Leisy Brewing Company, and lots 32, 33, 34 and 37 belong to the appellee, Jane A. Guth.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Peoria county; the Hon. T. M. Shaw, Judge, presiding. This is a condemnation proceeding, begun by the appellant company for the purpose of condemning seven lots in the city of Peoria, to-wit, lots 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 and 37 in Mills’ second addition to that city. Lots 29, 30 and 31 are the property of the appellee, the Leisy Brewing Company, and lots 32, 33, 34 and 37 belong to the appellee, Jane A. Guth. The lots front on Water street in the city of Peoria, and run back to or towards the Illinois river, or that part of the river which, at that point, is…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Magruder

First—The first ground, urged by tjie appellant in favor of reversing the judgment below, is that the damages awarded by the jury are excessive, and not warranted by the preponderance of the evidence.

There is great conflict in the testimony of the witnesses as to the value of the property condemned. Such conflict always exists in cases of this character. The witnesses for the appellant estimate the value of the lots at from §5.00 per front foot for the unfilled lots to §12.00 per foot for the filled lots. The highest valuation put upon the lots by the testimony for the appellant is something…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Braxon v. BresslerIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Illinois Linen Co. v. HoughIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Miller v. BalthasserIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. County of Mercer v. WolffIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Lanquist v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Chickasaw Compress Co. v. BowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Jefferson Park District v. SowinskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1929

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API